Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 29:10

הכיר בה ולא הכיר בה איכא בינייהו

or not.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra 12a. According to the first Tanna, the rival of R. Gamaliel's daughter was permitted only because her husband was unaware of her defect, and their marriage consequently took place under a misconception. Such a marriage being invalid, R. Gamaliel's daughter was not a legal wife, and her rival consequently was a mere stranger to her father. According to the 'Others', who use the expression 'was incapable' and not 'was discovered to be incapable', the rival was permitted to R. Gamaliel irrespective of whether his daughter's defect had or had not been known, to her husband. ');">²⁸</span> And if you wish I might say that the difference between them<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The 'Others' and the first Tanna. ');">²⁴</span> is the case where he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The husband, R. Gamaliel's brother. ');">²⁵</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 29:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.